Administrative
distance and metrics are two important factors when it comes to which routing
protocols.
Being knowledgeable
about these two Values can make all the difference in network performance,
reliability, and path selection.
If you haven’t seen
or heard about these two value and you have completed the course of CCNA means
that you have missed something important in the class.
Let me give you an
example.
When you enter the
command “Show ip route” you will see
the following output. Look at the two values in the bracket.
R 10.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 1.1.1.1, 00:00:15,
FastEthernet0/0
Here, 120 represent
the Ad Value and 1 represents the metric. The R at the starting represents the
route learned via RIP. So the Ad value of RIP is 120 and the metric it took to
reach the network is 1.
You can also get the
more details about the specific network by using the command show ip route
followed by the network you want to know more.
Here’s an example,
***************************************************************************************************************************************************
R2#sh ip route 10.0.0.0
Routing entry for 10.0.0.0/8
Known via
"rip", distance 120, metric 1
Redistributing via
rip
Last update from
1.1.1.1 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:00:09 ago
Routing Descriptor
Blocks:
* 1.1.1.1, from
1.1.1.1, 00:00:09 ago, via FastEthernet0/0
Route metric is
1, traffic share count is 1
******************************************************************************************************************************************************
ADMINISTRATIVE DISTANCE: It is
value used by Cisco routers to select the best path between source and
destination when multiple protocols are used.
E.g. An OSPF route with an
administrative distance of 110 will be chosen over a RIP route with an
administrative distance of 120.
Protocol
|
Administrative
Distance
|
Directly
Connected Route
|
0
|
Static
route out of an interface
|
1*
|
Static
route to next-hop ip address
|
1
|
EIGRP
summary Route
|
5
|
External
BGP
|
20
|
Internal
EIGRP
|
90
|
IGRP
|
100
|
OSPF
|
110
|
IS-IS
|
115
|
RIP
|
120
|
EGP
|
140
|
ODR
|
160
|
External
EIGRP
|
170
|
Internal
BGP
|
200
|
DHCP-
learned
|
254
|
Unknown
|
255
|
·
A route
with the value of AD 255 will not be installed in routing table because the
router will not trust that route.
·
Since IOS 12.2,
the administrative distance of a static route with an exit interface is 1.
Prior to the release of 12.2 it was in fact 0.
* Actual administrative distance is recognized somewhere
between 0 and 1. This AD is more trustworthy than 1 but less trustworthy than
0.
Metric:
It
is the method or formula used by a protocol to find the best path between
source and destination, when more than one path is available for the same
destination.
So,
a routing protocol uses its metric to find the best path to reach the
destination when more than one path is available. The lower the metric the more
preferred path that will be installed in the routing table.
Unlike
Administrative distance metric is involved in with only one routing protocol.
Every routing protocol has its own metric to find the best path.
e.g. Look at the output of the command of show ip eigrp topology
P 10.55.102.0/24, 1 successors, FD is
6049256
via 10.220.100.11 (6049256/5537506), Serial3/0
via 10.55.100.114 (52825700/281610), Serial2/0
via 10.220.100.11 (6049256/5537506), Serial3/0
via 10.55.100.114 (52825700/281610), Serial2/0
In the
above output EIGRP has two routes to reach the net 10.55.102.0/24. But only
with the route with lower metric will be installed in the routing table.
So the
first route i.e. via 10.220.100.11 will be installed in the routing table as it
has lower metric. The values in the bracket in the above output says, the first
part is the Feasible distance (FD) to the destination and the second part is
the advertise distance to the destination (AD). The output in the brackets
means (FD/AD).
Different
routing protocols calculate their metric in different ways. RIP uses hops, OSPF
uses bandwidth, and EIGRP uses a combination of bandwidth, delay, load, and
reliability.
For more details mail me at arahim.cisco@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment